{"id":106810,"date":"2026-04-07T17:11:41","date_gmt":"2026-04-07T10:11:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/advantage.vn\/?p=106810"},"modified":"2026-04-15T17:15:52","modified_gmt":"2026-04-15T10:15:52","slug":"ocean-freight-market-stalls-overcapacity-outweighs-the-hormuz-shock","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/advantage.vn\/en\/ocean-freight-market-stalls-overcapacity-outweighs-the-hormuz-shock\/","title":{"rendered":"Ocean Freight Market Stalls: Overcapacity Outweighs the ‘Hormuz Shock’"},"content":{"rendered":"

[Advantage Logistics<\/a><\/span>] Spot container freight rates on the East-West trades are moving sideways as overcapacity and weakening demand outweigh the upward momentum from the Hormuz crisis. This backdrop is forcing ocean carriers to pivot to an “ultra-short-term” pricing strategy to hedge against volume drop risks and volatile bunker surcharges.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Spot container freight rates on the major East-West trade lanes largely moved sideways this week. The root cause is structural overcapacity and an uneven demand recovery, which have thwarted ocean carriers’ attempts to push rates higher.<\/p>\n

The Divergent Picture on the Asia-Europe Trade<\/span><\/h2>\n

This week\u2019s World Container Index (WCI) from research consultancy Drewry indicates that spot rates on the Trans-Pacific and Asia-Europe trades appear to have largely stabilized after rebounding from the Middle East conflict shock.<\/p>\n

Specifically, on the Shanghai-Rotterdam leg, the WCI remained flat week-on-week at $2,543\/FEU (40-foot equivalent unit). Meanwhile, the Shanghai-Genoa leg edged up slightly by 2%, settling at $3,529\/FEU.<\/p>\n

This indicates that the new FAK (Freight All Kinds) rates introduced by carriers on Wednesday (April 1) have not yet truly taken effect. For instance, CMA CGM implemented a new FAK rate of $3,500\/FEU for shipments from Asia to Northern Europe, but this level remains roughly $1,000\/container higher than the actual prevailing market rates.<\/p>\n

According to analysts at Linerlytica, the issue lies in the fact that carriers on the Asia-Europe trade seem to be prioritizing volume over price. They noted that Asia-Europe rates continue to fluctuate as carriers announce general rate increases, only to undercut themselves shortly after when utilization rates fail to support the new pricing. Maersk continues to offer rates below the market average through spot freight discounts, despite earlier attempts at minor rate hikes. This pricing trend is highly likely to repeat itself throughout April.<\/p>\n

Drewry also noted that only four blank sailings have been announced for the coming week. Therefore, barring a sudden surge in demand during the Easter holidays, this sideways trend is likely to persist.<\/p>\n

Trans-Pacific Rates and Global Impacts<\/span><\/h2>\n

A similar situation is playing out on the Trans-Pacific trade, where the WCI’s Shanghai-Los Angeles route dropped 1% to $2,663\/FEU, while the Shanghai-New York leg increased 1% to $3,434\/FEU.<\/p>\n

However, looking at the broader picture, Xeneta\u2019s short-term spot rate data reveals that shippers and forwarders have had to weather an approximate 30% surge in spot rates from late February to early April.<\/p>\n

Peter Sand, Chief Analyst at Xeneta, observed that this disruption is global in nature: “Five weeks into the Strait of Hormuz closure and spot rates on every major East-West trade lane have risen sharply, showing this is a conflict with global repercussions for ocean supply chains.”<\/p>\n

“From Far East to North Europe and Mediterranean \u2013 trades with direct exposure to the Middle East disruption \u2013 spot rates are up 31% and 30% since the end of February.”<\/p>\n

He further emphasized that the risk has radiated far beyond the epicenter: “No shipper is insulated from financial or operational risk. Far East to US West Coast \u2013 a trade which transits the Pacific thousands of miles from the epicentre of conflict \u2013 has seen spot rates climb 29% since the end of February.”<\/p>\n

Xeneta\u2019s short-term market average rate on the Far East to US West Coast trade stood at $2,430\/FEU as of yesterday, with the East Coast at $3,382\/FEU.<\/p>\n

“Ultra-Short-Term” Pricing Strategy<\/span><\/h2>\n

Nevertheless, this upward momentum appears to have stalled, at least for this week. US West Coast-based forwarder Freight Right stated that shippers actively hunting for competitive rates “can still find rates as low as $1,650 from China to the US West Coast and $2,450 from China to the US East Coast.”<\/p>\n

According to Freight Right, sluggish US consumer demand – expected to be further exacerbated by rising gasoline prices – has prompted carriers to adopt an “ultra-short-term” pricing approach.<\/p>\n

A company representative explained this mechanism as follows: “After attempting to jack up prices in late March, carriers saw volume vanish, forcing them to pivot and lower rates slightly to attract any available cargo.”<\/p>\n

“By only committing to seven-day rate windows, carriers are protecting themselves against sudden spikes in fuel or further drops in demand.”<\/p>\n

The Fuel Cost Puzzle and Upcoming “Levers”<\/span><\/h2>\n

However, the bunker cost puzzle is currently the biggest risk casting a shadow over the entire market. A slew of emergency bunker surcharges are expected to be officially activated in the coming weeks, and these quantum levels will almost certainly be pushed even higher in direct proportion to the duration of the conflict.<\/p>\n

Despite this, Peter Sand noted that carriers still possess other tools to mitigate escalating costs, though few are appealing to shippers. Commenting on the bunker market, he shared: “Bunker fuel at Singapore – the world\u2019s leading bunkering hub – remains available, with prices roughly double pre-crisis levels, but trending slowly downward after an initial spike of around 200%.”<\/p>\n

However, other regions are facing their own unique challenges: “Rotterdam prices continue rising, and ship-to-ship fuel transfers in the Far East are adding cost and complexity.”<\/p>\n

In response, emergency contingency measures are being weighed: “With no visible end to the crisis, however, carriers are almost certainly drawing up another set of contingency plans.”<\/p>\n

“The coming weeks will show whether slow steaming and alternative routing can hold the line, or whether blank sailings become the next lever carriers reach for.”<\/p>\n

Source:<\/em>\u00a0Phaata.com\u00a0<\/strong>(According to gCaptain)<\/em><\/p>\n

>> Other news:\u00a0<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n